Sophie Germain was a wholly self-taught mathematical genius who began her career pretending to be a man, because the social conventions of her time prevented women following intellectual careers.
Her theory of surface vibrations brought her the prestigious Paris Academy of Sciences Prize in 1816, the first ever won by a women.
She made some of the most significant progress on a proof Fermat’s Last Theorem until the theorem was finally proven 170 years later, in 1995, by Andrew Wiles.
Marie-Sophie Germain was born in Paris, France on April 1, 1776, the second of three sisters.
Her father was Ambroise-Francois Germain, whose family had been in business for several generations. Business was good and the Germain family was growing increasingly affluent. In addition to his business, which was either gold or silk – history is uncertain – he was also politically active, as an elected representative.
How do you solve a problem like
Marie-Sophie was not the only Marie in the Germain household. The name was a family favorite. Her mother and older sister were both named Marie-Madeleine.
When you have three Maries in one home, something’s got to give. In this case, to avoid confusion, the main character in our tale, Marie-Sophie, was known to everyone as Sophie.
Sophie’s younger sister’s name was Angélique-Ambroise.
With the streets of revolutionary Paris unsafe, 13-year-old Sophie remained indoors reading – she might have preferred this anyway, because she was rather shy.Her father was an educated man who kept an extensive library. Sophie picked up Volume 1 of Jean-Étienne Montucla’s History of Mathematics.
Quickly she was captivated by the story of Archimedes, the towering genius of antiquity. Reading about his life and particularly his death fascinated her. She read that while the Roman Army invaded and pillaged his city of Syracuse, Archimedes was so immersed in geometry that he ignored the orders of a Roman soldier, who killed him.
Sophie was amazed that anyone could be so overwhelmingly and even fatally interested in mathematics. She decided mathematics was something she needed to know more about.
Fortunately, she was able to pursue her newly kindled interest with the help of her father’s books.
Sophie’s discovery of mathematics is similar to that of André-Marie Ampère, born just a year before Sophie, who also discovered a passion for mathematics in his father’s library.
Mathematics and Ceilings
As a liberal man, a man of the Enlightenment, Sophie’s father would have ensured his daughters were educated. It would be unthinkable for them to be illiterate, uninformed about art & music, or unsophisticated. Such women would find it difficult to find socially acceptable husbands. (Sophie’s sisters both married solid, middle-class, professional husbands.)
However, etiquette dictated that girls’ education was limited; it had a ceiling. Girls from affluent families should be able to take part in intelligent conversations, but they should not rise to intellectual prominence. Captivated by mathematics, Sophie now began chipping away at the time-honored ceiling.
The Empire Strikes Back
Sophie’s parents became increasingly unhappy about her growing obsession with mathematics. Too many of her waking hours were spent with her head in books. They reasoned that if her room were unlit and unheated she would be forced to stop work, get into bed, and sleep. So, believing they were acting for the best, Sophie was denied a fire to heat her room and deprived of candles to read by.
The Empire Surrenders
When her parents found Sophie asleep in her room early one winter morning huddled under a blanket with a mathematics book in front of her, a burned-out candle from a hidden cache beside her, and her inkwell frozen by the intense cold, they felt too distressed to continue with their scheme – Sophie was chilled to the bone. They surrendered. In future, their eccentric daughter would be allowed to spend as much time as she liked on mathematics.
Sophie began studying mathematics seriously at age 13, using Étienne Bezout’s mathematics textbook Traité d’ArithmÉtique. From its pages she learned about long-division, proportions, fractions, and logarithms. Within a few years, Sophie had taught herself calculus. She then got to grips with difficult mathematical works by Isaac Newton and Leonhard Euler written in Latin, a language she had to teach herself.
She blossomed as a mathematician, rising high above the modest ceiling society placed on girls’ intellectual ambitions. Moreover, she did not restrict her self-schooling to mathematics – she read about everything she could get her hands on, particularly psychology and philosophy.
In 1794, the year Sophie Germain celebrated her 18th birthday, an exciting new college opened its doors in Paris – the École Polytechnique. Regrettably, although the rallying cry of the French Revolution had been “Liberté, fraternité, égalité, ou la mort” (liberty, fraternity, equality, or death), women were denied the liberty and equality to attend this new college.
On the other hand, notes from the lectures at the École Polytechnique were made freely available to non-students. Germain obtained these lecture notes, particularly enjoying the great mathematician Joseph-Louis Lagrange’s course in analysis and the chemistry course given by Antoine Fourcroy.
Famous but Fragmented
Germain’s name became well-known in the intellectual circles of Paris and the city’s academics thought kindly of her. Nevertheless, everything in her garden was far from rosy:
- She needed postgraduate assignments to give her a rounded mathematical education. However, women were still not allowed into the city’s colleges, so Germain’s education was fragmented, leaving significant gaps in her mathematical armory.
- Social conventions made it difficult for her, as a single woman, to meet other mathematicians – her interactions were nearly all by mail.
- She needed robust criticism of her work, but most mathematicians would have felt it wrong to potentially hurt the feelings of a young woman by criticizing her efforts.
These factors tended to disadvantage Germain compared with her mathematical contemporaries. Her situation was more like that of Pierre de Fermat in an earlier age, who taught himself mathematics from library books and kept in contact with other mathematicians by mail.
1798 and 1801 were big years for mathematics and for Germain. In the first of these years another great French mathematician, Adrien-Marie Legendre, published his work on number theory: Essai sur la Théorie des Nombres ; in the second, Carl Friedrich Gauss, who was a year younger than Germain, published the greatest work on number theory ever written: Disquisitiones Arithmeticae.
Germain was inspired by these works, and pushed herself to new heights in number theory. She exchanged many letters with Legendre.
In 1804, Germain sent Gauss some of her original research, including progress with Fermat’s Last Theorem. Once more, rather than using her own name, she used LeBlanc’s, describing herself as an ‘enthusiastic amateur.’ (The real LeBlanc was now actually dead.)
Gauss was impressed enough by Monsieur LeBlanc’s work to begin a correspondence with him. Although he often took months to reply to LeBlanc’s letters, he was clearly impressed by ‘his’ work.
Please Don’t Kill Gauss
In 1806, France’s army invaded Brunswick, where Gauss lived. Horrified that Gauss might suffer the same fate as Archimedes, Germain contacted General Pernety, a friend of her family, requesting that he protect Gauss.
The General checked that Gauss was safe, telling him that Miss Germain in Paris was concerned for him. This confused Gauss, because he did not know a Miss Germain in Paris. Germain, when told about Gauss’s confusion, sent him a letter revealing that she and LeBlanc were actually the same person. Gauss replied:
The Mathematics of Sophie Germain
The Singing Plate and the Paris PrizeIn 1808, Ernst Chladni showed a fascinated audience of Parisian scholars how a violin bow could produce music and visible patterns in sand on a flat glass plate.
His audience already knew that musical notes and sound in general were caused by vibrations. Vibration of stringed instruments was mathematically understood.
Chladni was now showing France’s scientific elite something mathematically more challenging – a vibrating plate. The sand revealed that only certain areas of the plate vibrated, accumulating only where the plate was motionless.
At first sight, understanding vibrations on a plate of glass might seem rather trivial. In fact, the principles of vibration are vital in physics and engineering – for example, in aircraft design wing vibration must be understood as fully as possible to prevent disaster.
In 1809, Emperor Napoleon Bonaparte offered a prize for the development of a mathematical theory of elastic surfaces such as the vibrating plates demonstrated by Chladni. The deadline for entries was October 1, 1811.
The prize caught Germain’s imagination:
Analysis is the mathematics of limits, predominantly calculus. Leonhard Euler had already successfully described the mathematics of a vibrating rod, requiring one-dimensional analysis. Germain did not at first realize that working in two-dimensions to describe the vibrating plate required much more complicated analysis. Her friend Lagrange discouraged most mathematicians from even attempting to win the prize by declaring a solution would require a new system of analysis.
Germain’s approach was to apply Lagrange’s calculus of variations to Euler’s earlier results.
Although her ideas were good, her command of the calculus of variations was not perfect, which led to errors. With the assistance of Legendre, she worked out a solution and submitted it in September 1811. Hers was the only entry. However, the judges decided Germain’s entry did not meet their requirements and extended the competition for another two years.
Germain tried again and received an honorable mention for her next entry, but it had too many errors to succeed. She tried a third time and, on January 8, 1816, she was awarded the enormously prestigious Paris Academy of Sciences Prize, a one kilogram gold medal. Germain, now 39, was the first woman to win one.
In 1821, Germain published her research on elastic surfaces with the title: Récherches sur la théorie des surfaces élastiques, introducing a new concept to mathematical physics, still in use today, the mean curvature.
Fermat’s Last Theorem – Germain’s Best Work
In 1637, one of history’s greatest and most enigmatic mathematicians, Pierre de Fermat, wrote an equation similar to Pythagoras’s theorem for right-angled triangles. Fermat wrote his equation in words because he was not aware of Thomas Harriot’s invention of symbolic algebra. We shall use symbols:
If n=2, we have Pythagoras’s theorem, which has an infinite number of whole number solutions, the most famous example of which is the 3-4-5 triangle: x=3, y=4, z=5.
Fermat’s Last Theorem claims that if n is a whole number bigger than 2, the equation has no whole number solutions for x, y and z. Fermat himself left proof that he was correct for n=4. As a bonus, Fermat’s proof of his theorem for n=4 meant that only cases where n was an odd number were left to tackle. Fermat claimed to have proved it for all values of n, but famously said that the margin of his book was too small to write his wonderful proof.
Over a century later, Leonhard Euler proved Fermat was correct for n=3, although Euler’s proof is not quite rigorous enough for modern mathematicians.
Germain’s Grand Design
Germain saw little point in trying to prove Fermat’s Last Theorem for any individual number. Proving it for whole classes of numbers looked like a more fruitful approach. In this she had an advantage over previous mathematicians. As Gauss had acknowledged, she had penetrated deeply into the advances in number theory he described in Disquisitiones Arithmeticae. Fermat’s Last Theorem was also her favorite work:
In 1819, Germain informed Gauss that using her own general method, she could show that for n=5 there were no solutions to Fermat’s Last Theorem unless x, y, and z were truly enormous numbers. She added ruefully that enormous was not good enough; a mathematical proof must hold true for all numbers. Unfortunately, Gauss did not reply – he was now busy in other fields.
In fact, as she acknowledged in the quote above, her method was ultimately not viable.
Out of the ashes of Germain’s grand design rose the phoenix of Germain’s theorem, described by Legendre as ‘ingenious.’ The world learned of Germain’s theorem from a footnote in Legendre’s 1825 treatise on Fermat’s Last Theorem – a work in which he actually verified Fermat’s Last Theorem for n=5.
Legendre tells us that Germain, by hand calculation, used her own theorem to verify Fermat’s Last Theorem for p less than 100. Legendre repeated and verified her calculations. Using Germain’s theorem, Leonard Dickson showed in 1920 that Fermat’s theorem is true for p less than 1,700.
Beyond Germain’s Theorem
After reviewing Germain’s unpublished manuscripts, in 2010, Reinhard Laubenbacher and David Pengelley wrote that Germain’s research on Fermat’s Last Theorem had been much more meaningful than previously believed:
“The supporting algorithms she invented for this plan are based on ideas and results discovered independently only much later by others… comparison of her work with that of Legendre and later researchers, displays bold, sophisticated, multifaceted, independent work on Fermat’s Last Theorem, much more extensive than the single result, named Sophie Germain’s Theorem.”
Over 170 years later, in 1995, Andrew Wiles finally proved that Fermat’s Last Theorem is indeed true for all numbers.
Some Personal Details and the End
Germain never married and had no children. She was financially supported by her parents, allowing her to carry out mathematical research. She also wrote philosophical works.
People who knew her reported that she was rather shy and modest, a pleasant person to talk to.
In 1829, she discovered she was suffering from breast cancer; it claimed her life in 1831. Sophie Germain died, age 55, in Paris on June 27, 1831.
She was buried in Paris’s Père Lachaise Cemetery. Her resting place has a strange resonance with that of her mathematical hero Archimedes. After his burial, Archimedes’ tomb fell into disrepair. Cicero, the Roman Governor of Sicily, found that it had become overgrown with weeds and bushes, which he ordered to be cleared. Similarly, Germain’s grave fell into a state of disrepair, before it too was rediscovered and repaired. Archimedes tomb is now lost, but Germain’s grave can still be seen in Paris.
Author of this page: The Doc
Images of Germain created or digitally enhanced and colorized by this website.
© All rights reserved.
Cite this Page
Please use the following MLA compliant citation:
"Sophie Germain." Famous Scientists. famousscientists.org. 18 Jun. 2017. Web. <www.famousscientists.org/sophie-germain/>.
H. J. Mozans
Women in Science: With an Introductory Chapter on Women’s Long Struggle for Things of the Mind
D. Appleton and Company, New York and London, 1913
Mary W. Gray
Complexities : Women in Mathematics / edited by Bettye Anne Case, Anne M. Leggett
Princeton University Press, pp. 68-74, 2005
Andrea Del Centina
Letters of Sophie Germain Preserved in Florence
Historia Mathematica Vol. 32, pp. 60–75, 2005
Reinhard Laubenbacher and David Pengelley
“Voici ce que j’ai trouvé:” Sophie Germain’s grand plan to prove Fermat’s Last Theorem
arXiv:0801.1809v3 [math.HO], July 12, 2010
L.L. Bucciarelli, N. Dworsky
Sophie Germain: An Essay in the History of the Theory of Elasticity
Springer Science & Business Media, 2012
Image of Icelandic volcanic eruptions by Boaworm under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported license.