By publishing his evidence that Earth orbits the sun, Nicolaus Copernicus relegated our planet’s status from center of the universe to just another planet. In doing so, he began the scientific revolution.
Early Life and Education
Nicolaus Copernicus was born in the city of Torun, in the Prince-Bishopric of Warmia, northern Poland on February 19, 1473.
His name at birth was Mikolaj Kopernik. He started calling himself the Latin form of his name, Nicolaus Copernicus, when he went to university.
Nicolaus Copernicus was born into a wealthy family. He was named after his father, Mikolaj Kopernik, who was a prosperous copper trader. His mother, Barbara Watzenrode, also came from a wealthy, upper-class family of merchants. Nicolaus was the youngest of their four children.
When he was 10 years old, his father died. Then Nicolaus’s uncle, whose name was Lucas Watzenrode, a nobleman who was to become Prince-Bishop of the region of Warmia, became Nicolaus’s guardian.
In 1491, at the age of 18, Copernicus began as an undergraduate at the University of Krakow. There he studied astronomy, mathematics, philosophy, and the sciences. His main interests were reflected in the books he bought:
• Elements of Geometry by Euclid
• In Judgment of the Stars by Haly Abenragel
• Astronomical Tables by Alfonso X of Castile
• Astronomical and Mathematical Tables by Johannes Regiomontanus
In his final year at university Copernicus wrote his own observations on mathematics and astronomy. These he inserted into his personal copy of Johannes Regiomontanus’s book.
Copernicus in Italy
After four years at university, but without a degree, his nobleman uncle sent Copernicus to Bologna, Italy, to study canon law. His uncle, who had become Prince-Bishop of the region of Warmia, hoped that Nicolaus would return to become a canon in Warmia. It was a good church job, with a salary for life.
Copernicus was meant to spend three years in Italy studying the laws and regulations of the Catholic Church.It was intended that he become a Doctor of Law, which would help his work when he became a canon in Warmia.
His uncle would have been displeased if he had known that his nephew preferred to spend his time on astronomy, mathematics and learning Ancient Greek.
Learning Greek was important to Copernicus, because many of the great works he needed to understand for his astronomy were available only in Greek.
In the end, he did too little work on his law course and did not graduate. He did, however, add to his book collection: some law books, of course, plus some that had nothing to do with his official course, including:
• Cosmography by Claudius Ptolemy
• Summary of Ptolemy’s Almagest by Johannes Regiomontanus: this was a summary of Claudius Ptolemy’s great astronomical work, with additional notes by Regiomontanus
• Phenomena by Aratus of Soli: an ancient Greek work dealing with astronomy
During his time in Italy, Nicolaus Copernicus formally became a well-paid canon of the Catholic Church in Warmia. This was despite the fact that he was in Italy. Remember, though, his uncle was the Prince-Bishop of Warmia, and Uncle Lucas was looking after young Nicolaus’s interests!
In 1501, at the age of 28, Copernicus arrived back in Warmia and promptly asked for permission to return to Italy.
Copernicus told his uncle that he could get medical training in Italy, which would be useful in Warmia, and he could complete his law doctorate.
Perhaps he was also thinking that the skies above Italy were clearer than above Warmia – much better for sky watching!
He was granted two years’ further leave from his position as canon.
And so Copernicus headed south again, this time to the Italian city of Padua.
Once there, of course, he continued to study those things he was most interested in: astronomy and mathematics.
In addition to studying the things he was not meant to, this time he actually did do the work he was meant to. He studied medicine successfully and also managed to pass his exams to qualify as a Doctor of Law.
He returned to Warmia permanently in 1503. He was 30 years old.
Copernicus the Astronomer & his Heliocentric Solar System
From the year 1503 onwards, Copernicus acted as a secretary and physician for his uncle; he also performed religious duties, carried out government work, acted as an economist, and even assumed leadership in a time of war.
We shall devote no more time to these activities, however, because what we’re really interested in are his contributions to science. It’s safe to say his time for science was limited because of his many other duties.
Discovering Flaws in Current Astronomy
During his time in Bologna, Copernicus had become friends with the experienced Italian astronomer Domenico Maria Novara. They had carried out many hours of observations of the night sky together, with Copernicus serving an informal astronomy apprenticeship.
At this point, it’s worth reminding ourselves that astronomers in those days worked with the naked eye. Galileo Galilei was the first person to look at the heavens with a telescope, and Galileo wasn’t born until Copernicus had been dead for over 20 years.
One of the books in Copernicus’s collection was Summary of Ptolemy’s Almagest by Johannes Regiomontanus.
Claudius Ptolemy’s work, which had been written in Greek, had been the final word in all matters astronomical for over 1300 years. Copies of the Almagest had come to Europe from the Arab world. Astronomers like Johannes Regiomontanus suspected errors had crept in when translations had been made from Ptolemy’s Greek into Arabic and then from Arabic into Latin, the language of educated Europeans.
For example, Ptolemy’s work seemed to demand that every month the moon’s distance from the earth should vary by a factor of two. Yet that would mean every month the moon would appear to change in size by a factor of two, growing, then shrinking again. Nobody had ever seen that happen, so something had to be wrong – Regiomontanus thought the translators had made mistakes.
Regiomontanus obtained copies of Ptolemy’s work in the original Greek and translated them directly into Latin.
It turned out that the errors were actually present in Ptolemy’s original work.
And now Copernicus gathered his thoughts:
• He had read Regiomontanus, who showed Ptolemy had made errors.
• He had observed and discussed the heavens with Domenico Maria Novara, who told him Ptolemy had made errors.
• He had also heard the opinions of other Italian academics, such as Alessandro Achillini, who had written a book casting doubt on Ptolemy’s work.
If Ptolemy could be wrong about something as basic as the moon’s orbit, then maybe he’d messed up other stuff too. Everything in astronomy could be up for grabs!
For example, Ptolemy had said Earth was at the center of the universe – the so-called geocentric doctrine. Could that be wrong too?
It was clear to Copernicus that Ptolemy was not the final word in astronomy. One day, perhaps he could add some words of his own.
The Heliocentric Universe
Back in Warmia, in 1503, Copernicus worked on astronomy when he could, but he was usually busy with other duties.
Nevertheless, by 1514, he had seen enough in the sky and thought enough about his observations to circulate a few pages with the title Commentariolus – The Little Commentary to people he trusted.
In this hand-written document he put forward his new view of the universe. He thought people should shift from a geocentric (earth centered) view to a heliocentric (sun centered) view.
He took as the basic starting points of his theory:
• The earth is not the center of the universe.
• The center of the universe is near the sun.
• The Earth-Sun distance is negligible compared to the distance to the stars.
• Earth’s rotation accounts for the apparent daily rotation of the stars.
• The apparent annual cycle of movements of the sun is caused by the earth orbiting it.
• The apparent retrograde motion of the planets is caused by the motion of the Earth from which one observes the planets.
With these starting points, he had relegated our planet from a special, highly privileged position at the center of the universe, to nothing very special – another planet moving around the sun. This was potentially dangerous, because a lot of people held the view that:
• passages in the Bible imply that the earth does not move
• the Bible is the word of God
• the penalty for disagreeing with God is death
Of this type of thinking Copernicus would later write:
Of course, at this time, Copernicus had revealed his new theory of the universe to just a small number of trusted friends. You’re not going to begin a scientific revolution doing that!
On the other hand, in those days it was best not to broadcast your heretical beliefs too widely, not if you valued your life – even if you did ‘scorn the judgment’ of the people who were burning you at the stake!
Copernicus has Everything he Needs to Start the Scientific Revolution
By 1532 Copernicus had made all of the observations and applied all of the mathematics he needed to identify Earth’s place in the universe. And he had finished writing the first manuscript of his groundbreaking book De revolutionibus orbium coelestium – The Revolutions of the Celestial Spheres.
He did not publish it, though, because he was worried about the reception it would get. He showed it to close friends and associates, and word began to leak out that Copernicus had a theory that the earth and the planets orbit the sun. The Pope heard about it, and Archbishops heard about it, but at this stage people just wanted to hear more about it – nobody came after Copernicus to burn him at the stake.
By 1539, seven more years had passed and Copernicus had still not published.
This changed when Georg Joachim Rheticus, a German mathematician, came to learn everything he could from Copernicus.
Rheticus studied with Copernicus for two years. He read De Revolutionibus Orbium Coelestium and was incredibly enthusiastic about it. He thought Copernicus owed it to the world to publish it.
Rheticus also helped Copernicus by bringing him new books about mathematics, which helped with Copernicus’s final calculations for the movements of the heavenly bodies.
Meanwhile, Copernicus allowed Rheticus to publish a book called Narratio prima – The First Report, in which Rheticus gave a basic summary of Copernicus’s heliocentric theory.
Again, no mobs gathered demanding death to the heretics.
And so Copernicus gave the manuscript of his book to Rheticus to be printed in Germany.
An Unauthorized Addition to Copernicus’s Book
The printing turned out to be a source of great anger to Rheticus and Copernicus.
The printing was supervised by Andreas Osiander, who added a note at the beginning of the book which said that, even though the book’s theory was unusual, if it helped people do astronomy calculations, it didn’t matter if it wasn’t really true.
Although Rheticus and Copernicus were deeply unhappy with Osiander’s unauthorized note, there’s every chance that the book was only allowed to circulate freely because of it. Osiander had given the church an excuse not to condemn the book immediately as heretical.
The book came off the printing presses shortly before Copernicus’s death in 1543. Copernicus, diplomatically, had dedicated his book to the Pope.
Another factor that saved the book from immediate suppression is that it was so mathematically difficult that only highly educated people could read it, most of whom were less likely to start ranting on street corners than others might have been.
Reaction to Copernicus’s Book
The general feeling among astronomers who read and understood all of Copernicus’s book – the observations and the mathematics – was that this was the best book on astronomy for 1300 years. It was the equal of Ptolemy’s Almagest – and that was very high praise indeed.
Copernicus’s theory that the planets move around the sun in circular orbits removed a number of problems caused by Ptolemy’s geocentric theory. In particular, Copernicus removed the need for the equant – a very awkward mathematical device required to make Ptolemy’s geocentric theory work to any extent.
With the benefit of hindsight, we can also see today that Copernicus’s approach enabled him to be the first person to establish the correct ordering of the solar system’s planets. Ptolemy had wrongly placed Earth closer to Mercury than Venus.
Unfortunately, Copernicus’s theory was not a perfect description of the planets’ movements. Although he was correct that the planets orbit the sun, he was wrong in saying that they follow circular paths. This error led, like Ptolemy’s system, to some awkward mathematical compromises.
And so astronomers used Copernicus’s methods where they found them helpful, but most saw little need to abandon their basic geocentric views.
Kepler, building on Copernicus’s work, showed that the solar system is indeed heliocentric, but the planets do not follow circular orbits; their orbits are elliptical.
Unusually, disapproval of Copernicus – who was now dead – united both Catholic and Protestant Church leaders, although as time passed Catholic disapproval increased, while Protestant disapproval decreased.
As support for the truth of Copernicus’s heliocentric theory began to grow stronger, the Catholic Church, sensing a threat to its supremacy, declared that support for heliocentrism was heresy. In 1616 the Church banned Copernicus’s book completely.
In 1620 the Church approved Copernicus’s book after editing it: any sentences in which Copernicus wrote about a moving Earth and a central Sun as a matter of fact were removed or changed. Despite the final approval, the book was still not actually published in any countries with a powerful Catholic Church.
Nevertheless, support for Copernicus continued to grow, and his ideas triumphed over those of his opponents. It was a victory for evidence based, observational science, interpreted using the language of nature – mathematics.
Almost two millennia before Copernicus published his theory of a heliocentric universe, the ancient Greek astronomer Aristarchus published the first heliocentric universe theory. You can read that fascinating story here.
We all agree the solar system is heliocentric, don’t we?
Amazingly, despite it being clear for centuries that our solar system is heliocentric, opinion polls in countries including Germany, the United States, and the United Kingdom show about 1-in-5 or 1-in-6 people still believe that the sun orbits the earth!
Nicolaus Copernicus died of a stroke, at the age of 70, on May 24, 1543. He had not married and had no children. He had devoted his life to science, the church, and government.
He was buried in Frombork Cathedral, Poland. His grave was lost for centuries, but found again in 2005. His remains were reburied in Frombork Cathedral in 2010. His new tombstone shows a golden sun with six planets orbiting it.
Author of this page: The Doc
Images of Nicolaus Copernicus enhanced and colorized by this website.
© All rights reserved.
Cite this Page
Please use the following MLA compliant citation:
“Nicolaus Copernicus.” Famous Scientists. famousscientists.org. 15 Dec. 2014. Web.